Case study · Cognitron Health
Remote cognitive assessment after stroke
In stroke survivors, Cognitron found cognitive deficits in patients the MoCA scored as normal, and separated thinking ability from hand motor impairment.
Stroke survivors followed for up to two years
- Stroke survivors followed
- 171
- Stroke survivors followed
- Of follow-up
- 2 years
- Of follow-up
- Tasks assessed
- 18
- Tasks assessed
- Tasks where hand impairment distorted standard scores
- 10
- Tasks where hand impairment distorted standard scores
The challenge
After a stroke, many people have cognitive problems that a short clinic screen can miss. Hand weakness makes it worse: on standard tests, slow or clumsy responses can look like poor thinking.
Our approach
Stroke survivors completed Cognitron's IC3 battery, supervised and unsupervised, and 171 were followed for up to two years. Cognitron's scoring models the timing of every response, so it can separate cognitive ability from the time taken to see, move, and respond.
The outcome
Cognitron found deficits in patients the MoCA scored as normal (26 or above out of 30), and explained around twice as much of patients' real-world functional impairment and quality of life.
Standard scores were distorted by hand motor impairment on 10 of 18 tasks. Cognitron's corrected measures showed no distortion and matched pen-and-paper clinical tests more closely (mean R-squared 0.65 vs 0.43). Results were equivalent whether tested supervised or at home, with minimal practice effects.
Reference
Gruia DC, Giunchiglia V, Braban A, et al. Mitigating the impact of motor impairment on self-administered digital tests: a longitudinal cohort study in stroke. eClinicalMedicine. 2025;88:103469. doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103469
Gruia DC, Giunchiglia V, Coghlan A, et al. Development and validation of the IC3: an online remote assessment technology for deep phenotyping and monitoring of cognitive impairment after stroke. Assessment. 2025. doi.org/10.1177/10731911251381572